Last updated: Aug 1, 2025, 02:00 PM UTC

Comprehensive Institution Analysis Prompt Template

Generated: 2025-07-26 19:00 UTC
Status: Complete
Purpose: Generalizable prompt for comprehensive institutional analysis documentation

Parameters (Customize These)

# Institution Details
INSTITUTION_NAME: "London School of Architecture"
INSTITUTION_SHORT: "LSA"
INSTITUTION_TYPE: "Educational Institution"
PARTNER_INSTITUTION: "University of the Built Environment"
LOCATION: "London, UK"
PROGRAM_FOCUS: "Master of Architecture (Part 2)"
PROGRAM_DURATION: "2 years"

# Document Sources
CONTRACT_DOCUMENTS:
  - "Student Terms and Conditions"
  - "Academic and Programme Regulations"
  - "Refund and Compensation Policy"
WEBSITE_URL: "https://www.the-lsa.org/"
INDUSTRY: "Architecture Education"

# Analysis Scope
YEARS_TO_ANALYZE: 2
FEE_ANALYSIS_REQUIRED: true
PEOPLE_IMAGES_REQUIRED: true
MARKET_COMPARISON_REQUIRED: true

Master Prompt

Conduct a comprehensive analysis of [INSTITUTION_NAME] ([INSTITUTION_SHORT]), creating a complete documentation suite covering contracts, financials, leadership, reputation, and market position. Follow these requirements:

Phase 1: Contract and Legal Analysis

  1. Extract and analyze all contract documents for [INSTITUTION_NAME]:

    • Read all [CONTRACT_DOCUMENTS] PDFs thoroughly
    • Create organized analysis covering:
      • analysis-comprehensive-contract-review-plan.md - Master overview with cross-references
      • analysis-key-terms-obligations.md - Core contractual framework
      • analysis-risks-important-clauses.md - Risk assessment and critical clauses
      • summary-student-rights-responsibilities.md - Rights and obligations guide
      • analysis-academic-regulations-progression.md - Academic requirements

  2. Financial Analysis:

    • costs-fee-calendar-self-funded-students.md - Payment schedules and timelines
    • fee-increase-verification-deep-dive.md - Contract clause verification
    • fee-increase-[PROGRAM_DURATION]-corrected.md - Accurate calculations
    • Calculate maximum fee increases over [PROGRAM_DURATION]
    • Create refund windows and financial risk assessments

  3. Critical Risk Areas to identify:

    • Practice placement/internship liability disclaimers
    • Fee increase mechanisms and caps
    • Program cancellation/change rights
    • Academic progression limitations
    • Intellectual property ownership
    • Force majeure provisions

Phase 2: Institutional Research

  1. Create institutional overview documents:

    • key-facts-[INSTITUTION_SHORT].md - Mission, programs, structure, partnerships
    • leadership-ownership-structure.md - Current governance and transitions
    • information-sources-list.md - All research sources with verification status

  2. Leadership and Faculty Analysis:

    • [INSTITUTION_SHORT]-faculty-teaching-staff-analysis.md including:
      • Current leadership team with backgrounds
      • Founding faculty and their credentials
      • Academic governance bodies
      • Teaching model and staff ratios
      • Professional practice connections

    For each person include:

    • Educational background
    • Professional experience
    • Current role and specialization
    • Estimated age/career stage (where appropriate)
    • LinkedIn/professional profiles
    • Notable achievements

Phase 3: Market and Reputation Analysis

  1. Reputation Assessment:

    • reputation-standing-analysis.md covering:
      • Academic rankings and recognition
      • Industry partnerships ([NUMBER]+ practices)
      • Graduate employment outcomes
      • Professional accreditation status
      • Media coverage analysis
      • Unique market positioning

  2. Market Comparison (if MARKET_COMPARISON_REQUIRED):

    • analysis-comparative-[INDUSTRY]-fees-[YEAR].md
    • Compare home vs international student fees
    • Analyze competitor institutions
    • ROI analysis and salary expectations
    • [INDUSTRY]-job-market-analysis.md with advertised roles

  3. Additional Market Research:

    • architect-salary-career-progression-analysis.md
    • uk-[INDUSTRY]-qualification-pathway.md
    • [INSTITUTION_SHORT]-online-influencers-social-media.md

Phase 4: Deep Dive Analyses

  1. Specialized Deep Dives based on identified risks:

    • practice-placement-deep-dive-analysis.md - If work placements required
    • Focus on highest-risk contractual areas
    • Liability analysis and student protection gaps
    • Comparison with traditional institutions

  2. Final Comprehensive Report:

    • final-comprehensive-review-report.md with:
      • Executive summary of all findings
      • Risk assessment matrix
      • Financial projections
      • Recommendations for stakeholders
      • Overall rating and conclusions

Phase 5: Documentation Standards

  1. Apply these standards to ALL documents:

    # Document Title

**Generated**: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC  
**Status**: Complete/In Progress  
**Verified**: ✅ (verified) / ❓ (speculated)

## Overview
[Brief description of contents and purpose]

  2. Verification Requirements:

    • Mark all information as (verified from official sources) or (speculation/estimation)
    • Include specific clause references for contracts
    • Cite all external sources with URLs
    • Cross-reference related documents

  3. Visual Elements:

    • Include mermaid diagrams where helpful
    • Use tables for structured comparisons
    • Apply card-style layouts for people profiles
    • Add section emojis for navigation ( etc.)

Phase 6: People and Images (if PEOPLE_IMAGES_REQUIRED)

  1. Image Research and Integration:

    • Research professional photos for all key people mentioned
    • Verify images from official sources (100% identity certainty required)
    • Download from:
      • Official institution websites
      • LinkedIn professional photos
      • Professional practice websites
      • Academic institution pages
    • Save to _images/people/ directory
    • Create ATTRIBUTIONS.md with full credits

  2. Image Integration Format:

    <img src="../_images/people/[name].jpg" alt="[Full Name], [Title]" width="200" style="float: right; margin: 10px; border-radius: 8px;">

Phase 7: Navigation and Cross-References

  1. Create Master Navigation:

    • README.md as comprehensive hub with:
      • Quick navigation by user type (students, administrators, researchers)
      • Document categorization (contracts, finances, people, market)
      • Key statistics summary box
      • Risk summary highlights
      • Cross-reference guide table

  2. Ensure Comprehensive Linking:

    • Every major topic links to detailed analysis
    • Related documents reference each other
    • Clear hierarchy from overview to deep dives

Output Structure

docs/
├── contract-analysis/
│   ├── analysis-comprehensive-contract-review-plan.md
│   ├── analysis-key-terms-obligations.md
│   ├── analysis-risks-important-clauses.md
│   ├── summary-student-rights-responsibilities.md
│   └── analysis-academic-regulations-progression.md
├── fees-[INSTITUTION_SHORT]/
│   ├── costs-fee-calendar-self-funded-students.md
│   ├── fee-increase-verification-deep-dive.md
│   └── fee-increase-[PROGRAM_DURATION]-corrected.md
├── [INSTITUTION_SHORT]-deepdive/
│   ├── key-facts-[INSTITUTION_SHORT].md
│   ├── leadership-ownership-structure.md
│   ├── [INSTITUTION_SHORT]-faculty-teaching-staff-analysis.md
│   ├── reputation-standing-analysis.md
│   ├── practice-placement-deep-dive-analysis.md
│   ├── [INSTITUTION_SHORT]-online-influencers-social-media.md
│   └── information-sources-list.md
├── _images/
│   ├── faculty/
│   └── people/
│       └── ATTRIBUTIONS.md
├── prompts/
│   └── comprehensive-institution-analysis-prompt.md
├── final-comprehensive-review-report.md
└── README.md

Key Analysis Patterns

  1. Risk-First Approach: Always identify and highlight highest risks prominently
  2. Financial Clarity: Break down all costs, increases, and refund scenarios
  3. Verification Standards: Never present unverified information as fact
  4. Student Perspective: Frame findings from prospective/current student viewpoint
  5. Comparative Context: Compare with industry standards and competitors
  6. Visual Organization: Use formatting to enhance readability and navigation
  7. Comprehensive Coverage: Address all stakeholder concerns systematically

Quality Checklist

Before completing analysis, verify:

  • All source documents thoroughly analyzed
  • Financial calculations double-checked
  • Risk areas clearly identified and assessed
  • People research includes verified images where possible
  • Cross-references link all related content
  • Navigation enables easy discovery
  • Verification markers (/) used throughout
  • Executive summary captures key findings
  • Recommendations are actionable
  • All documents follow formatting standards

Example Execution

For London School of Architecture, this prompt would generate:

  • 20+ comprehensive analysis documents
  • Complete contract risk assessment
  • Faculty profiles with images
  • Market comparison with 10+ competitor institutions
  • Financial projections with fee increase scenarios
  • Navigation system for 92 pages of source material
  • Executive summary with strategic recommendations

The same prompt structure can analyze any educational institution, professional association, or membership organization by adjusting the parameters.