Document Classification & Framework Analysis Prompt
Purpose: Analyze generated documents from autonomous research phases to identify reusable frameworks vs project-specific artifacts
Use Case: After completing multi-phase product research to optimize knowledge management and framework enhancement
Output: Comprehensive classification analysis with reorganization recommendations
Prompt Template
You are tasked with analyzing all documents generated during an autonomous product research and development process. Your goal is to classify each document and identify opportunities to extract reusable methodologies for framework enhancement.
Analysis Framework
Classify each document into three categories:
PROJECT ARTIFACTS (Derived Content)
- Specific to the researched product/industry
- Contains market research findings, competitor data, user testimonials
- Derived from WebSearch results about specific domain
- Low reusability across different products
POLICY FRAMEWORKS (Methodological Content)
- General approaches applicable to any product
- Architectural opinions, best practices, methodologies
- Technology recommendations not tied to specific industry
- High reusability across different domains
GENERAL GUIDES (Extractable Instructions)
- Step-by-step procedures embedded within documents
- How-to instructions that could be standalone guides
- Process documentation with universal applicability
- Medium to high extraction value
Analysis Process
Step 1: Document Inventory
- List all generated documents across all phases
- Note current location, phase, and approximate word count
- Identify document type and primary content focus
Step 2: Content Classification
For each document, determine:
- Primary Classification: Project/Policy/Guide
- Derivation Source: What research/data informed it
- Framework Value: Low/Medium/High reusability
- Embedded Guide Content: Y/N for extractable instructions
- Framework Candidate: Y/N for moving to framework
Step 3: Strategic Analysis
- Calculate percentages for each classification type
- Identify highest-value framework candidates
- Find extractable guide opportunities
- Assess overall framework enhancement potential
Required Output Structure
Create a comprehensive analysis document with:
1. Executive Summary
- Total document count and classification breakdown
- Key insights about content types and reusability
- Strategic recommendations overview
2. Classification Framework
- Clear definitions and criteria for each category
- Examples of what belongs in each classification
3. Comprehensive Document Table
Master table with columns:
- Phase
- Document Name
- Classification (Project/Policy/Guide)
- Primary Content Type
- Derivation Source
- Reusability Score (Low/Medium/High)
- Embedded Guide Content (Y/N)
- Framework Candidate (Y/N)
4. Phase-by-Phase Analysis
- Detailed breakdown showing evolution from derived to policy content
- Identify patterns in how research findings became methodologies
5. High-Value Framework Candidates
Prioritized lists:
- Tier 1: Must-have framework documents (critical value)
- Tier 2: High-value framework documents (important)
- Include rationale for each recommendation
6. Extractable Guide Opportunities
Categorized by type:
- Development & Technical Guides
- Design & UX Guides
- Research & Analysis Guides
- Include extraction value assessment
7. Framework Integration Recommendations
- Immediate actions (high priority moves/extractions)
- Secondary actions (medium priority enhancements)
- Long-term optimization strategies
8. Strategic Impact Assessment
- Quantify framework enhancement value
- Calculate improvement in reusability
- Estimate impact on future product creation speed
Key Questions to Address
Content Analysis:
- Which documents contain industry-specific research vs general methodologies?
- What procedures are embedded within documents that could be extracted?
- Which approaches proved most successful and should be standardized?
Framework Enhancement:
- How can the autonomous research system be improved for future products?
- What reusable components would accelerate product creation?
- Which methodologies should become part of the core framework?
Knowledge Management:
- How should content be organized for optimal reusability?
- What's the best structure for separating evidence from methodology?
- How can procedural knowledge be captured and standardized?
Success Criteria
The analysis should provide:
- Clear Classification: Every document properly categorized
- Actionable Recommendations: Specific moves/extractions with priorities
- Strategic Value: Quantified impact on framework improvement
- Implementation Roadmap: Phased approach to optimization
Example Classifications
Project Artifact Example:
- Document:
analysis-competitor-framework.md - Classification: Project Artifact
- Reason: Contains specific research about ActiveCampaign, Mailchimp pricing
- Framework Value: Low (industry-specific findings)
Policy Framework Example:
- Document:
tech-stack-analysis.md - Classification: Policy Framework
- Reason: Zero-cost architecture principles applicable to any product
- Framework Value: High (transferable methodology)
General Guide Example:
- Document:
dev-environment-setup-docker.md - Classification: General Guide
- Reason: Contains step-by-step Docker setup procedures
- Framework Value: High (universally applicable instructions)
Expected Outcome
A comprehensive analysis that transforms project-specific research artifacts into an enhanced autonomous research framework with:
- Clear separation between evidence and methodology
- Extracted reusable guides and procedures
- Prioritized integration recommendations
- Strategic roadmap for framework optimization
This analysis enables the autonomous research system to be 3-5x more effective for future product creation by leveraging proven methodologies and standardized procedures.
Framework Analysis Prompt - Optimizing autonomous research systems through strategic document classification and methodology extraction.